December 31, 2020
Printable version (PDF, 3 MB)
Table of Contents
- 1.1. Foreword
- 1.2. Explanatory notes
- 1.3. Convention refugee definition
- 1.3.1
Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, s. 96 - meaning of "Convention refugee"
- 1.3.2
Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, Section 108(1) and (4)- rejection and cessation
- 1.3.3
Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, s. 98 - exclusion clauses
- 1.3.4 Schedule to the
Immigration and Refugee Protection Act - exclusion clauses
- 1.3.5 What the paper covers
- 1.4. General rules of interpretation
- 1.4.1. Surrogate protection
- 1.4.2. Fear of persecution for a convention reason
- 1.4.3. Two presumptions at play in refugee determination
- 1.4.4. State complicity not required
- 1.4.5. Existence of fear of persecution
- 1.4.6. Use of underlying anti-discrimination law in interpreting particular social group
- 1.4.7. Broad and general interpretation of political opinion and perception of persecutor
- 1.4.8. Examiner to consider the relevant grounds
- 1.4.9. Section 7 Of the
Charter
- 1.4.10. All elements of the definition must be met
- 1.4.11. Personal targeting not required
- 1.4.12. Applicable test: “Reasonable or serious possibility”
- 1.4.13. Exclusion clauses
- 1.4.14. International human rights instruments
- 1.5. Definition of person in need of protection
- 2.1. Introduction
- 2.2. Country of nationality
- 2.2.1. Multiple nationalities
- 2.2.2. Establishing nationality
- 2.2.3. Right to citizenship
- 2.2.3.1. Israel’s law of return
- 2.2.4. Effectiveness of nationality
- 2.2.5. Failure to access possible protection in a third country
- 2.3. Former habitual residence - Stateless persons
- 2.3.1. Principles and criteria for establishing country of former habitual residence
- 2.3.2. Multiple countries of former habitual residence
- 2.3.3. Nature of ties to the country
- 2.3.4. Subsisting well-founded fear of persecution
- 2.3.5. Evidence of persecution for a convention reason
- 2.3.6. State protection
- 3.1. Generally
- 3.1.1. Definition and Ggeneral principles
- 3.1.1.1. Serious harm
- 3.1.1.2. Repetition and persistence
- 3.1.1.3. Nexus
- 3.1.1.4. Common crime or persecution
- 3.1.1.5. Agent of persecution
- 3.1.2. Cumulative acts of discrimination and/or harassment
- 3.1.3. Forms of persecution
- 3.1.3.1. Some judicial observations
- 4.1. Generally
- 4.2. Race
- 4.3. Nationality
- 4.4. Religion
- 4.5. Particular social group
- 4.6. Political opinion
- 4.7. Victims of criminality and nexus to grounds
- 4.8. Civil war and other prevalent conflicts
- 4.8.1. Generally
- 4.8.2. Two approaches: Comparative and non-comparative
- 4.9. Indirect persecution and family unity
- 5.1. Generally
- 5.2. Subjective fear
- 5.2.1. Subjective fear is an essential element
- 5.2.2. Establishing a subjective fear
- 5.3. Delay in seeking protection
- 5.3.1. Summary of governing principles
- 5.4. Types of delay
- 5.4.1. Delay in leaving the country of persecution
- 5.4.2. Failure to seek protection in other countries
- 5.4.2.1. Explanations for not seeking protection in other countries
- 5.4.3. Delay in making a claim upon arrival in Canada
- 5.5. Return to country of persecution - reavailment
- 5.6. Objective basis for the claimant’s fear
- 5.6.1. Standard of proof for factual findings
- 5.6.2. Legal test to establish a risk of persecution
- 5.6.3. Relationship between the standard of proof and the legal test
- 5.7. Sur place claims
- 5.7.1. No good faith requirement for a sur place claim
- 5.7.2. Claimant’s activities abroad
- 5.7.3. Claimant’s motivation may be relevant to risk assessment
- 5.7.4. Credibility
- 5.7.5. Events in the claimant’s home country
- 6.1. Introduction - General principles
- 6.1.1. Surrogate protection
- 6.1.2. Multiple nationalities
- 6.1.3. Timing of analysis
- 6.1.4. Unable or unwilling - A blurred distinction - No requirement for state complicity
- 6.1.5. Presumptions
- 6.1.6. Nexus
- 6.1.7. Burden and standard of proof and rebutting the presumption
- 6.1.7.1 Burden of proof and obligation to approach the state
- 6.1.7.1.1. More than one authority in the country
- 6.1.7.2 Standard of proof
- 6.1.7.3 Rebutting the presumption of protection
- 6.1.7.3.1 The evidentiary burden of “clear and convincing”
- 6.1.7.3.2. Standard of protection
- 6.1.8. Source of protection
- 6.2. Stateless claimants
- 7.1. Change of circumstances
- 7.1.1. Notice requirements
- 7.1.2. Standard of Proof
- 7.1.3. No special test for changes in country conditions
- 7.1.4. Assessing changes in country conditions
- 7.1.5. Post-hearing evidence may be considered by the panel
- 7.1.6. Duty to provide sufficient reasons and consider all relevant evidence
- 7.2. Compelling reasons
- 7.2.1. Introduction
- 7.2.2. Applicability
- 7.2.3. Duty to consider section 108(4)
- 7.2.4. Meaning of “compelling reasons”
- 7.2.5. Level or severity of harm
- 7.2.6. Psychological evidence and psychological after-effects
- 7.2.7. Persecution of others
- 7.2.8. Generalized persecution
- 7.2.9. Return to the country of persecution and persecutory incidents across multiple states
- 7.2.10. Adequacy of reasons
- 8.1. The two-prong test and general principles
- 8.2. Notice - Burden of proof
- 8.3. Interpretation and application of the two-pronged test
- 8.3.1. Fear of persecution
- 8.3.2. Reasonable in all the circumstances
- 9.1. Introduction
- 9.2. Prosecution, or persecution for a convention reason
- 9.2.1. Limits to acceptable legislation and enforcement
- 9.2.2. Laws of general application
- 9.2.3. Policing methods, national security and preservation of social order
- 9.2.4. Enforcement and serious possibility
- 9.2.5. Exit laws
- 9.2.6. Military service: Conscientious objection, evasion, desertion
- 9.2.7. One-child/two-child policy of China
- 9.2.8. Religious or cultural mores
- 9.2.8.1. Restrictions upon women
- 9.2.8.2. Ahmadis from Pakistan
- 10.1. Introduction
- 10.2. Test
- 10.3. Nature of the residency rights
- 10.4. Rights and obligations of a national
- 10.5. Onus –
Prima facie evidence
- 10.6. Onus to renew status
- 10.7. Access to obtain status substantially similar to nationals
- 10.8. Fear of persecution and state protection in the Article 1E country
- 11.1. Introduction
- 11.1.1. Standard of proof - Serious reasons to consider
- 11.1.2. Balancing and complicity generally
- 11.2. Article 1F(a): Crimes against peace, war crimes and crimes against humanity
- 11.2.1. Crimes against peace
- 11.2.2. War crimes
- 11.2.3. Crimes against humanity
- 11.2.4. Defences
- 11.2.4.1. Duress
- 11.2.4.2. Superior orders
- 11.2.4.3. Military Nnecessity
- 11.2.4.4. Remorse
- 11.2.5. Complicity
- 11.2.5.1. The test for complicity
- 11.2.5.2. Applying the test
- 11.2.6. Responsibility of superiors
- 11.3. Article 1 F(b): Serious non-political crimes
- 11.3.1. Generally
- 11.3.2. No requirement for “equivalency”
- 11.3.3. Determination of whether a crime is serious
- 11.3.4. Determination of whether a crime is political
- 11.3.5. Prior to admission
- 11.3.6. “Serious reasons for considering”
- 11.4. Article 1F(c): Acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations
- 11.5. Burden of proof and notice
- 11.6. Consideration of inclusion where claimant is excluded
- 12.1. Introduction
- 12.2. Legislative framework
- 12.2.1. Reforms to cessation regime - 2012
- 12.2.2. Overview of cessation provisions in IRPA
- 12.3. Jurisdiction to decide applications to cease - Refugee status conferred by s. 95(1)
- 12.4. Procedure
- 12.4.1. Responsible minister
- 12.4.2. How an spplication is made
- 12.4.3. Order of questioning
- 12.4.3. Language of proceedings
- 12.5. Interpretation of the grounds
- 12.5.1. Burden and standard of proof
- 12.5.2. General principles
- 12.5.3. Paragraph 108(1)(a) - Reavailment
- 12.5.3.1. Voluntariness
- 12.5.3.2. Intention
- 12.5.3.2.1. Minors
- 12.5.3.2.2. Presumption from obtaining a passport
- 12.5.3.2.3. Application of the presumption in the case law
- 12.5.3.3. Actual reavailment
- 12.5.4. Paragraph 108(1)(b) - Voluntary acquisition of nationality
- 12.5.5. Paragraph 108(1)(c) - Acquisition of a new nationality
- 12.5.6. Paragraph 108(1)(d) - Re-establishment
- 12.5.7. Paragraph 108(1)(e) - Change of circumstances
- 12.6. Other issues
- 12.6.1. Discretion to consider which grounds apply
- 12.6.2. Relevance of future risk
- 12.6.3. Relevance of humanitarian and compassionate considerations
- 12.6.4. Abuse of process and similar arguments
- 12.6.5. Constitutionality of cessation provisions
- 13.1. Introduction
- 13.2. Legislative framework
- 13.2.1. Historical context
- 13.2.2. Current legislation
- 13.3. Jurisdiction of the Refugee Protection Division
- 13.4. Procedure
- 13.4.1. Responsible minister
- 13.4.2. How the application is made
- 13.4.3. Order of questioning
- 13.4.4. Language of proceedings
- 13.4.5. Protected person as witness
- 13.4.6. Member as witness
- 13.4.7. Rule requirements
- 13.5. Interpretation of Section 109
- 13.5.1. Burden and standard of proof
- 13.5.2. Overview of analytical framework – two-step analysis
- 13.5.3. What evidence is admissible at each step of the analysis?
- 13.5.4. Issues related to subsection 109(1) – misrepresentation
- 13.5.4.1. Materiality
- 13.5.4.2. Direct versus indirect misrepresentation or omission
- 13.5.4.3. Intention
- 13.5.4.4. Credibility and weighing evidence
- 13.5.5. Issues related to subsection 109(2) – other evidence considered at the first determination justifying protection
- 13.5.5.1. Assessing the remaing evidence
- 13.5.5.2. Exclusion
- 13.5.5.3. Which law should apply
- 13.6. Other issues
- 13.6.1. Section 7 of the
Charter
- 13.6.2.
Res Judicata/Second application
- 13.6.3. Abuse of process arguments
- 14.1. Introduction
- 14.2. Legislative framework
- Person in need of protection –
IRPA, s. 97(1)(a) and (b)
- 14.3. s. 97(1) Elements that apply to both paragraphs (a) and (b)
- 14.3.1 Legal test for the degree of risk
- 14.3.2 Prospective risk
- 14.3.3 Claimant would be personally subject to the risk
- 14.3.4 No subjective fear component
- 14.4. Danger of torture – IRPA, s. 97(1)(A)
- 14.4.1. Harm feared – Torture
- 14.4.1.1 Intentional infliction of severe pain or suffering
- 14.4.1.2 Inflicted for a purpose
- 14.4.1.3 State involvement
- 14.4.1.4 Lawful sanctions exception
- 14.4.2. Torture claims often accepted under s. 96
- 14.4.3. Need to deal with s. 97(1)(a) if rejecting a claim
- 14.4.4. State protection may be relevant if state involvement is limited
- 14.4.5. Internal flight alternative
- 14.5. Risk to life, risk of cruel and unusual treatment or punishment – IRPA, s. 97(1)(b)
- 14.5.1. Harm feared – Risk to life, Cruel and unusual treatment or punishment
- 14.5.2. Conditions specifically applicable to s. 97(1)(b) risks
- 14.5.2.1. First condition - No state protection
- 14.5.2.2. Second condition – No IFA
- 14.5.2.3. Third condition - The risk is not faced generally
- 14.5.2.3.1. Confusion caused by imprecise wording
- 14.5.2.3.2. Two distinct, conjunctive elements
- 14.5.2.3.3. Assessing prospective risk before considering conditions
- 14.5.2.3.4. Individualized inquiry
- 14.5.2.3.5. Risk arising from criminal activity
- 14.5.2.3.6. Being “specifically” or “personally” targeted
- 14.5.2.3.7. The nature of a risk can change
- 14.5.2.3.8. Comparing the claimant’s risk
- 14.5.2.4 Fourth condition - Lawful sanctions
- 14.5.2.4.1. Punishment
- 14.5.2.4.2. Prison Conditions
- 14.5.2.4.3. Exit Laws
- 14.5.2.4.4. Military Service
- 14.5.2.5 Fifth condition - Inability to provide adequate health or medical care